Care management and 90-day post discharge mortality in patients hospitalized for myocardial infarction and COVID-19: A French nationwide observational study.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant or cured coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) may lead to difficulties in acute care management and impair prognosis. AIMS: To describe and compare the characteristics, care management and 90-day post discharge outcomes of patients hospitalized for MI who did not have COVID-19 with those of patients with concomitant or previous hospital-diagnosed COVID-19. METHODS: This population-based French study included all patients hospitalized for MI in France (30 December 2019 to 04 October 2020) from the French National Health Data System. Outcomes were described for each COVID-19 group and compared using adjusted logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 55,524 patients hospitalized for MI, 135 had previous hospital-diagnosed COVID-19 and 329 had concomitant COVID-19. Patients with previous hospital-diagnosed COVID-19 had more personal history of cardiovascular diseases than those without concomitant/previous confirmed COVID-19. In-hospital and 90-day post discharge mortality rates of patients with previous COVID-19 were 8.1% and 4.0%, respectively, compared with 3.5% and 3.0% in patients without concomitant/previous confirmed COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR]adjin-hospital 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-3.46; ORadjpostdischarge 0.77, 95% CI 0.28-2.13). Patients with concomitant COVID-19 had more personal history of cardiovascular diseases, but also a poorer prognosis than their no concomitant/no previous confirmed COVID-19 counterparts; they presented excess cardiac complications during hospitalization (ORadj 1.62, 95% CI 1.29-2.04), in-hospital mortality (ORadj 3.31, 95% CI 2.32-4.72) and 90-day post discharge mortality (ORadj 2.09, 95% CI 1.24-3.51). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital and 90-day post discharge mortality of patients hospitalized for MI who had previous hospital-diagnosed COVID-19 did not seem to differ from those hospitalized for MI alone. Conversely, concomitant COVID-19 and MI carried a poorer prognosis extending beyond the hospital stay. Special attention should be given to patients with simultaneous COVID-19 and MI, in terms of acute care and secondary prevention.

Myocardial infarction throughout 1 year of the COVID-19 pandemic: French nationwide study of hospitalization rates, prognosis and 90-day mortality rates.

BACKGROUND: Studies reported a decrease in hospital admissions for myocardial infarction (MI) in early 2020 as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, mainly restricted to the beginning of the pandemic. AIMS: To describe national trends in hospital admissions for MI in 2020, and to compare patient characteristics, in-hospital prognosis and 90-day mortality between patients who had an MI in 2020 and those admitted in 2017-2019. METHODS: All patients hospitalized for MI in France from 2017 to 2020 were selected from the national hospital discharge database. Analyses compared temporal trends in MI admissions, in-hospital cardiac complications and mortality rates in 2020 versus 2017-2019. RESULTS: In 2020, 94,747 patients were hospitalized for MI, corresponding to a 6% decrease in MI admissions compared with 2017-19. This decrease was larger during the first lockdown (-24%; P<0.0001) than during the second lockdown (-8%; P<0.0001). Reductions in MI admissions were more pronounced and longer among patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI, older people and women. An increase in ST-segment elevation MI admissions was observed between lockdowns (+4%; P=0.0005). Globally, and after adjustment for age, sex and calendar year, in-hospital and 90-day post-discharge mortality rates did not differ in 2020 versus 2017-19: incidence rate ratio (IRR)adjin-hospital 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.98-1.08); IRRadj90-daypost-discharge 1.06, 95% CI (0.98-1.13). CONCLUSIONS: In 2020, a significant decrease in MI admissions was observed, and was marked at the beginning of the year. This highlights the need to disseminate public information on the importance of maintaining care and regular medical follow-up. The effect of the COVID-19 crisis on acute and 3-month outcomes of patients hospitalized for MI appears limited. Nevertheless, monitoring of chronic MI complications and the impact on non-hospitalized patients should continue.

Emergency department admissions for myocardial infarction and stroke in France during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: National temporal trends and regional disparities.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the national lockdown have led to significant changes in the use of emergency care by the French population. AIMS: To describe the national and regional temporal trends in emergency department (ED) admissions for myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, before, during and after the first national lockdown. METHODS: The weekly numbers of ED admissions for MI and stroke were collected from the OSCOUR® network, which covers 93.3% of all ED admissions in France. National and regional incidence rate ratios from 02 February until 31 May (2020 versus 2017-2019) were estimated using Poisson regression for MI and stroke, before, during and after lockdown. RESULTS: A decrease in ED admissions was observed for MI (-20% for ST-segment elevation MI and-25% for non-ST-segment elevation MI) and stroke (-18% for ischaemic and-22% for haemorrhagic) during the lockdown. The decrease became significant earlier for stroke than for MI. No compensatory increase in ED admissions was observed at the end of the lockdown for these diseases. Important regional disparities in ED admissions were observed, without correlation with the regional levels of COVID-19 cases. The impact of lockdown on ED admissions was particularly significant in six regions (Ile-de France, Occitanie, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, Nouvelle Aquitaine, Hauts-de-France and Bretagne). CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in ED admissions for MI and stroke observed during the lockdown was probably caused by fear of COVID-19 and augmented by the lockdown, and was heterogeneous across the French territory. ED admissions were slow to return to the usual levels from previous years, without a compensatory increase. These results underline the need to reinforce messages directed at the population to encourage them to seek care without delay in case of cardiovascular symptoms.

[COVID-19 and STEMI]. / COVID-19 et SCA ST.

The COVID-19 pandemic had an unexpected impact on cardiovascular emergencies, particularly STEMI. The France PCI registry and other studies around the world have highlighted a significant decrease in myocardial infarctions arriving at hospital. This decrease is mainly related to patients' fear of coming to the hospital and being contaminated. Although the STEMI revascularisation time targets (<120min) are often difficult to achieve in normal times, they were almost impossible to achieve in periods of lockdown because of the many obstacles. Longer delays and longer total ischemic time have led to excess mortality, especially in the regions most affected by the epidemic. Recommendations for the management of STEMI during the COVID-19 period have thus been issued by the scientific societies. STEMI in patients with COVID-19 often have an uncommon clinical presentation, and the absence of coronary obstruction on angiography is frequent. Their prognosis is very poor. Only public information campaigns and an organisation adapted to the management of coronary emergencies during epidemics can try to limit their effects and avoid aggravating an already fragile health situation in the future.

Worrying decrease in hospital admissions for myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: How coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is affecting management of myocardial infarction is a matter of concern, as medical resources have been massively reorientated and the population has been in lockdown since 17 March 2020 in France. AIMS: To describe how lockdown has affected the evolution of the weekly rate of myocardial infarctions (non-ST-segment and ST-segment elevation) hospital admissions in Lyon, the second largest city in France. To verify the trend observed, the same analysis was conducted for an identical time window during 2018-2019 and for an unavoidable emergency, i.e. birth. METHODS: Based on the national hospitalisation database [Programme de médicalisation des systèmes d'information (PMSI)], all patients admitted to the main public hospitals for a principal diagnosis of myocardial infarction or birth during the 2nd to the 14th week of 2020 were included. These were compared with the average number of patients admitted for the same diagnosis during the same time window in 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: Before lockdown, the number of admissions for myocardial infarction in 2020 differed from that in 2018-2019 by less than 10%; after the start of lockdown, it decreased by 31% compared to the corresponding time window in 2018-2019. Conversely, the numbers of births remained stable across years and before and after the start of lockdown. CONCLUSION: This study strongly suggests a decrease in the number of admissions for myocardial infarction during lockdown. Although we do not have a long follow-up to determine whether this trend will endure, this is an important warning for the medical community and health authorities.